Nine evaluated product projects, with the score, the work submitted, what the mentor said, and a practical next revision.
A design brief and presentation for a twelve-city rollout; modelled distinct growth in orders, rider writes and live tracking.
The mentor praised the state machine and incident plan. The executive budget still contained placeholder figures.
Replace the budget placeholders with a sourced range and mark modelled figures as assumptions.
An India travel-platform strategy linking host and guest trust, Experience supply, MVPs and revenue hypotheses.
Top submission. The mentor praised the supply-side distinction and assumptions ledger, but found too many live ideas and no stop rules for the MVP tests.
Rank the MVPs, cut lower-priority bets, add a baseline and a stop rule for each test.
A discovery-to-delivery funnel plan, cohort framing and rollout roadmap.
The mentor liked the rating and fee-breakdown ideas but flagged invented or conflicting baselines presented as observed data.
Label assumptions, check the funnel maths and validate a real baseline before claiming a lift.
A retention PRD and presentation with badges and community challenges.
The mentor found that the deck lacked the required visual user flows and that retention and revenue numbers lacked a source.
Draw a real challenge-joining flow with branches, specify badge rules, and use one measurable goal with a stated baseline.
A UX review and proposed checkout redesign using heuristics and mobile-flow analysis.
The mentor flagged unverified usability numbers and heuristic mappings, and could not find evidence of an observed checkout walkthrough.
Capture actual checkout screens, document one observed defect, then remap heuristics and explain the trade-off of the proposed three-step flow.
A group case study of basket-building, threshold effects and a Meal Kits idea.
The mentor praised the Meal Kits rationale and clear scope note, but noted no primary user research, unpriced incentives and qualitative rather than numeric RICE scoring.
Test the assumptions with a few Zepto users, price one incentive tier, and put numbers behind the RICE ranking.
A pickup-coordination report and presentation covering the handoff between rider and driver.
The mentor valued the gate-timing insight but challenged repeated interview answers and an unsupported cancellation baseline.
Keep only distinct, traceable interviews, remove unsupported metrics and focus the recommendation on observed pickup friction.
A land-and-expand plan for a support workflow product.
The mentor liked the concrete adoption threshold but found that the target segment repeated the brief and too many roadmap initiatives stayed alive.
Choose a narrower first segment, identify an actual buyer blocker, and cut a plausible roadmap item with an explicit cost.
A skincare-shopping analysis with a root-cause map, solution concepts and a phased roadmap.
The mentor praised the root-cause framing and spec-ready interactions but could not verify the claimed review sample or projected lift.
Add raw tagged examples and method notes for review and competitor claims; set targets only after measuring a baseline.
Evaluations captured September 26, 2026. Original evaluation links may require signing in to Airtribe. No peer feedback or other group members are shown.